Academics and journalists are thus far failing to learn what works by ignoring legacy business activities.Mauro F.
We must learn what works well and what doesn't, for all involved parties.
It's just spreading to other sectors now because of technology innovation. There are others.Īgain, the gig economy isn't a new phenomenon. Yet, despite its Gig-like behavior, nurse staffing seems to elude journalists and academics. There are more problems and risks for staffed nurses than ever. Staffed nurses play the role of scapegoats, too, blaming them for mistakes and shifting risk from the hospital. Further, hospital administrators have dramatically increased the burden on nurses, increasing nurse-to-patient coverage and demanded more and more of them without assistance. If hospital census (# of patients) is low, shifts are cancelled up to minutes before work is scheduled to begin. Yet, the costs and risks continue to rise for nurses. This market of nurses enables work-life flexibility and pays fairly well. Hospital administrators partner with nursing agencies, who manage relationships with nurses and contract short-term work. In unregulated, non-unionized states, nurses are staffed as-needed. Take, for instance, nurse staffing in the United States. "Gig Economy" is a new label on an old practice. The study used for this article can be found here. Most of us are not terribly concerned if the server is paying taxes properly and are concerned that the business is basically welfare for inefficient businesses who should probably go under. Since nobody on earth can live on $200 a month some combination of tips from you, government benefits paid for by you, and second or third jobs makes survival possible. In short employers sometimes pay as little as $2 an hour x 24 hours per week. It also helps cover the foregone wages when the employee is working through breaks and lunches even though the half hour lunch is deducted from the employees pay.
Gigeconomy fuck yeah plus#
The extra cash helps for when business is slow and the server has to report they made the minimum wage to the employer anyway because the employer is responsible for ensuring that the server makes state minimum if the wage plus tips doesn't equal such.īasically the employer will just fire people who make the employer actually do this. In both cases its a transfer of wealth from the middle class to relatively rich owners. The "market" rate is partially set based on those assumptions because employees wouldn't be able to live on what they are paid thus the labor force and thus the company would collapse without an increase in wages. The servers in states which allow below minimum wage for tipped employees is keeping servers near starvation wages if not for state benefits and undeclared tips. There is no way they can be competitive (to the extent their investors will want) without breaking either Tax law or Labor laws.
And this will only mean one thing: Uber will pack up and leave.
Gigeconomy fuck yeah drivers#
This being revealed will obviously now mean that Uber will be forced to pay an estimated and much higher tax, and the drivers won't be trusted to do this themselves in the fuuture.
Gigeconomy fuck yeah driver#
The kicker is: there is a huge incentive for the individual driver to under-report the fares, and that incentive also helps Uber. Uber drivers are supposed to enter the rides themselves into the meter after completing. Taxis are required to enter all fares into the meter and that's reported to tax authorities. So how can Uber make a killing in Stockholm? Answer: they find another regulation to work around. In Stockholm where there are no Taxi mediallions (anyone can be a taxi or car hire service in any way they want as long as they regiser and comply with insurance, standardized meters, and other regulations) and the competition alreay has new cars, app-based booking etc - there is precious little margin for Uber to cut from, compared to a city with medallions, cab shortages, ancient taxi companies that don't offer app hauling/prepayment etc. The trick is to grow so fast that regulation can't keep up (in the US you can even grow so fast that eventually you'll be big enough to lobby your own regulation). What they do is grow at a breakneck sped into an area where there is regulation that can be abused. It should be called the "loophole upstart economy". Uber will be (and is already in many places) like any other Taxi company. AirBnB will be like any other apartment rental place. That loophole will close, and the business will either need to expand or converge to a traditional business of the kind it displaced. You can only win as a "gig economy" as long as you find a weak spot (a.k.a loophole) in regulations and use it.
0 kommentar(er)
